Loyalty points vs subscribe and save
Choose by how predictable the next order is. If customers buy the same item on a rhythm you could put in a calendar, a standing order at a better price removes the decision entirely and is worth more than any points balance. If they buy different things at unpredictable intervals, points suit them better, because the reward follows spending rather than a schedule they cannot keep.
The two also differ in what they cost you. A standing order gives a discount on every future purchase, which is expensive but buys certainty. Points cost nothing until they are redeemed, and a share of them never are, but they only influence behaviour if customers can see the balance and reach a reward within a realistic number of orders.
A store with one hero consumable should build the standing order. A store with a wide changing range should build points, and spend the effort on making the balance visible rather than on the size of the reward.
Choose
Loyalty points
when
- Customers buy across a varied range rather than repeating one item
- The gap between orders is irregular and no schedule would suit everyone
- Your range changes with seasons or drops, so choice is part of the appeal
- You want to reward reviews, referrals and sign ups as well as orders
- Margin cannot support an ongoing reduction on every future order
Choose
Subscribe and save
when
- One or two products account for most repeat orders
- Consumption is steady enough to predict the next order within a week or two
- Running out is a real inconvenience the customer wants to avoid
- You can hold stock and ship every cycle without substitutions
- The saving matters more to your customers than choice does
| Criterion | Loyalty points | Subscribe and save |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Only paid when points are redeemed, plus the platform fee | A standing reduction on every future order, from the first cycle |
| Setup effort | Earning rules, redemption, balance shown in the account and in email | Plan pricing, cycle management, skip and pause, failed payment handling |
| Time to signal | Months, since the effect appears in the second and third order | Two to three cycles, so weeks for a fast moving consumable |
| Control | You set what is rewarded and can adjust earning rates | Revenue is predictable, but customers control when they leave |
| Best for | Wide catalogues, seasonal ranges, discovery led shopping | Single hero consumables, replenishment categories |
| What can go wrong | Rewards sit too far away and nobody changes their behaviour to reach them | Cycles outpace consumption and cancellations follow the third delivery |
| How we measure it | Repeat purchase rate and orders per customer for members against non members | Active plans, retention at cycle two and three, and revenue per subscriber |
When both apply
Running both is reasonable once the standing order exists, provided one does not undercut the other. Let subscribers earn points too, so the plan is the better deal rather than a trade off, and keep the deepest saving inside the plan.
A clean division is a plan for the consumable and points for everything else. The customer who buys the refill on a schedule also earns toward the accessories and new lines they buy occasionally, which is exactly the behaviour you want from a category where one product repeats and the rest does not.
Questions
Related
Your plan is free.
A person reads it. You keep the plan. No logins, no call first.